Samsung 860 Pro 512gb Vs Evo

Samsung 860 Pro review: get the 860 Evo SSD instead

The Pros and cons of Samsung's new SSD

Samsung's Pro range of SSDs accept always had a hard time in the face of their cheaper Evo counterparts. On the confront of information technology, they're meant to be faster and longer-lasting - the very best SSD for gaming, then to speak - but when the Samsung 850 Evo and 960 Evo proved to be pretty much just as quick as their respective Pro siblings for a lot less cash, they've become increasingly difficult to justify. Unless you regularly move hundreds of GBs of files around your PC on a daily basis, Samsung'due south Evo SSDs are more than than enough for your typical gamer.

The 860 Pro is no dissimilar. Speed-wise, Samsung claims it'southward a fraction faster than both the outgoing 850 Pro and incoming 860 Evo with a sequential read speed of up to 560MB/s and a sequential write speed of upwards to 530MB/s, but in reality they're all pretty much identical. Why, then, should yous consider the 860 Pro? It'southward all to do with endurance.

In much the same style as the 860 Evo took the 850 Evo'due south endurance to the adjacent level, the 860 Pro goes ane farther, offering upwards to a mahoosive 4800 terabytes written (TBW) for the top 4TB model. That's double what the 860 Evo offers at 4TB, and viii times more than the 600 TBW you got with the 4TB 850 Pro.

Lower capacities do good, also. Whereas before yous only got 150 TBW for the 256GB model or 300 TBW for the 512GB and 1TB models of the 850 Pro, yous now become 300 TBW as standard on the 256GB 860 Pro, 600 TBW for the 512GB edition and 1200 TBW for the 1TB version. 2TB 860 Pro owners, meanwhile, get 2400 TBW, an improvement of about 2000 TBW over the 2TB 850 Pro.

Samsung 860 Pro ports

Impressive stuff, merely before you get dazzled by the numbers, consider this: while the 850 Pro gave you a generous ten-year warranty, the new 860 Pro only gives you a v-year warranty. Yes, you've got significantly more than TBs to play with, merely information technology even so doesn't seem nearly as good value.

Of course, much like I said in my Samsung 860 Evo review, endurance is a tricky creature to actually examination when y'all oasis't been using it constantly over a number of years. Therefore, what I tin say most 860 Pro right now is pretty much express to fast it is, which (as it turns out) isn't actually that much quicker than the 860 Evo.

In fact, the 1TB 2.5in model of the Samsung 860 Pro I had in for testing was virtually universally slower than the 2TB 2.5in 860 Evo I was sent. I tested them with the aforementioned system, likewise, which comprises of a 3.6GHz Intel Core i5-8600K processor, 16GB of Corsair Vengeance 3000MHz RAM and an Asus Prime Z370-P motherboard.

Information technology wasn't much slower, all told, merely take AS SSD's 1GB sequential examination, which reads and writes 1GB of files in adjacent locations on an SSD'due south storage. Here, the 860 Pro managed 522.08MB/south read and 489.82MB/s write. The 860 Evo, on the other hand, pipped it to the post on both occasions with speeds of 524.45MB/s read and 496.29MB/s write. That's non great when the Pro's meant to exist the faster drive and enabling the 860 Pro's Rapid fashion in Samsung'southward Magician software did little to better things either, increasing its read speed to just 525.35MB/s and write speed to 490.88MB/s.

Samsung 860 Pro vs 860 Evo

The 860 Pro closed the gap in Every bit SSD'south 1GB random 4K test, which reads and writes 1GB worth of 4K chunks in random locations on an SSD drive, but merely slightly. This is a much more than authentic representation of the speeds you're likely to see in everyday use, but even multiple retests merely saw the 860 Pro produce a read speed of xl.33MB/s and write speed of 98.88MB/south with Rapid mode left off, and 41.60MB/s and 100.80MB/southward with Rapid mode enabled. The 860 Evo, by comparing, was simply a hair's latitude behind with 40.27MB/s and 98.25MB/s respectively.

CrystalDiskMark's strenuous workstation-grade random 4K eight-queue-eight-thread test painted a similar picture as well, with the 860 Evo matching the Pro on read speed, coming in at 403MB/south apiece, and edging ahead on write speed with 360MB/s as opposed to the Pro's 358MB/southward.

Granted, information technology's not a huge difference, just I'd expect more than given the veritable canyon betwixt their corresponding prices. The 256GB 860 Pro, for instance, currently costs £126 / $140, while the 860 Evo comes in at simply £ninety / $95. The gap only gets more pronounced as y'all go up in capacity, as well, with £63 / $80 separating the 512GB models, £123 / $150 sitting betwixt 1TB drives and a hefty £226 / $300 dividing the 2TB sizes.

As a outcome, unless y'all're actually going to use all those extra thousands of TBW, you lot could relieve yourself a pregnant chunk of change by opting for the 860 Evo instead. You don't have to brand any compromise on speed, and the 860 Evo'south endurance is still light years ahead of anything else, making information technology much better value for money.

In fact, those in the UK needn't fifty-fifty spend that much, equally Samsung'south every bit zippy 850 Evo is still widely bachelor from around £lxxx. That particular boat has already sailed in the The states sadly, with 850 Evo stock growing increasingly scarce, just United kingdom folk should seriously consider opting for the 850 Evo if y'all want to catch yourself a deal. After all, while the 850 Evo may not be guaranteed for as many TBW, you still get that tasty five-year warranty, putting you in just as good a position as its successor if it happens to go kaput before you lot reach your capacity's maximum TBW limit. Either fashion, the 860 Pro just isn't worth the extra cash, and then practice yourself a favour and (one time again) get an Evo instead.